Biofuels: 'Irrational' and 'even Worse than Fossil Fuels'

Biofuels: 'Irrational' and 'even worse than nonrenewable fuel sources'

The UK's "irrational" use of biofuels will cost motorists around ₤ 460 million over the next 12 months, a think tank says.

A report by Chatham House, external states the growing dependence on sustainable liquid fuels will also increase food rates.

The author states that biodiesel made from grease was worse for the climate than fossil fuels.

Under EU law, external, biofuels are set to make up 5% of the UK's transportation fuel from today.

Since 2008, the UK has actually required fuel providers to add a growing percentage of sustainable products into the fuel and diesel they provide. These biofuels are primarily ethanol distilled from corn and biodiesel made from rapeseed, utilized cooking oil and tallow.

Deep fried fuel

But research study carried out for Chatham House states that reaching the 5% level suggests that UK motorists will need to pay an extra ₤ 460m a year due to the fact that of the higher expense of fuel at the pump and from filling more frequently as biofuels have a lower energy material.

The report state that if the UK is to meet its obligations to EU energy targets the cost to drivers is likely to rise to ₤ 1.3 bn per year by 2020.

"It is hard to discover any excellent news," Rob Bailey, senior research fellow at Chatham House, told BBC News.

"Biofuels increase costs and they are an extremely pricey method to decrease carbon emissions," he said.

The EU biofuel mandates are also having extremely distorting impacts in the marketplace. Because used cooking oil is concerned as one of the most sustainable types of biodiesel, the cost for it has actually risen rapidly. Rob Bailey states that towards the end of 2012 it was more costly than refined palm oil.

"It develops a monetary reward to purchase refined palm oil, cook a chip in it to turn it into utilized cooking oil and then sell it at revenue,"

"It is crazy but the rewards exist."

There are likewise worries that taking EU land out of production to grow rapeseed oil in particular is creating more environment problems than it solves. The more fuel of this type that is taken into cars and trucks the bigger the deficit developed in the edible oils market. This had actually resulted in increased imports of palm oil from Indonesia, frequently produced on deforested land.

"Once you take into consideration these indirect effects, biofuels made from vegetable oils actually result worldwide in more emissions than you would get from utilizing diesel in the first place," said Rob Bailey.

"Plus you are asking motorists to pay more for the fuel - it makes no sense, it is a totally illogical strategy."

Biofuel benefits

The European Biodiesel Board (EBB), which represents the market, external across the EU, said it understood the problems triggered by the mandate. But it believes that biofuels have lots of positives.

"Blaming biofuels for all the problems on the planet is a bit too exaggerated," said Isabelle Maurizi, task supervisor at the EBB.

"It has brought great deals of advantages. It has actually improved the security of our diesel; it has lowered EU reliance on animal feed imports, thanks to the rapeseed we grow for biodiesel."

"If there was no biodiesel farmers would just make their land idle - no food, no feed!"

As the UK hits the 5% of liquid fuels mark, the government faces some difficult decisions on how to move forward on this problem as it faces tripling the costs for vehicle drivers by 2020.

Insiders suggest its choice would be to attempt and get arrangement in Brussels on the impacts of indirect costs which may constrain what counts as biofuel. However getting arrangement from nations with effective agricultural sectors who gain from the current arrangement will be difficult.

"When you have a lobby that includes the agricultural sector and the oil sector it is extremely tough for Governments to make a U-turn," stated Rob Bailey.

County begins recycling chip fat